Tariq M, Sattar A, Khalid A, Azam M, Mehmood M, Hafeez R, Rafaqat S. Role of tumor markers and cytokines in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(6): 121169 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.121169]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the World Journal of Clinical Oncology for considering our manuscript for publication. We are grateful to the editorial team for their professionalism, valuable guidance, and constructive support throughout the peer-review process, which made our publication experience highly positive. We also extend our heartfelt thanks to the reviewers for their insightful comments and thoughtful recommendations, which significantly enhanced the scientific quality, clarity, and overall impact of our manuscript.
Furthermore, we appreciate the journal's efficient editorial management and language-editing services, which substantially improved the presentation and readability of our work. The timely email communications and comprehensive updates regarding the manuscript status ensured a transparent and well-organized review process. We are honored to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in this field and look forward to engaging in future scholarly discourse through your esteemed journal.